|
|
Post by Barbarossa on Jul 27, 2017 17:20:02 GMT -5
A way to sort wrestlers by type, loners, flyers etc. This would make specialty matches much easier to book. |
|
|
|
Post by Papa Chopper on Aug 16, 2017 15:25:49 GMT -5
A lot of people have previously suggested that 3-way and 4-way matches and battle royals should be implemented and as cool as they might be, they could end up making the spreading out of said specialty matches something if a headache. What I would suggest is create a new category of "event" (to add to Match, Mic Spot and Skit) called "Gimmick Match" or some other useful name... These matches would work like the Skit/Mic Cards in the sense that you can choose form a variety of different ones, and pick and mix your wrestlers as you see fit and that you would have to PURCHASE them like you would normal Skit/Mic Spots. However you would process them like you would a normal match, with a winner. You could spread out the "Gimmick Match" so it takes place only at PPVs, maybe one could have a two or have one every now and then on a regular show. The only things to consider would be: - They can't be title matches, as those can already have a gimmick to it via Match Type. - The Gimmick Matches would have to be something that can't be structured as regular 1-on-1 or 2-on-2 match cos you already have match types for those. - Matches that could be processed with a "team" winning: 3-Way Tags, 4-Way Tags, War Games, 5 on 5 Elimination matches. - Matches that could be processed with a "single person" winning: 3-Way, 4-Way, Battle Royal (15-20 max cos it would take too long to fill everyone unless it was random/automatic). - The Shop cost for said Gimmick Matches should increase according to the number of wrestler slots it would involve...which means the Battle Royal should (and rightly so) be ABSURDLY expensive to make it worth the challenge of getting it. - The actual booking cost should also follow a similar cost curve, since the more wrestlers involved the more it should cost...maybe 1000-2000 for a battle royal? So those are my two cents thrown in  |
|
|
|
Post by Dark Invader on Aug 16, 2017 23:16:56 GMT -5
Love that the Foils button is now greyed out when no foil is available. Simple update that is very, very helpful. Cheers!
|
|
|
|
Post by Voidhawk on Aug 17, 2017 9:08:05 GMT -5
This will be all tag team stuff.
I would love to be able to pick a tag teams from the Flavor button and have the game pull the wrestlers in.
I understand why the Tag Team of the Year is limited to tag teams that already exist but I would love to see some community created tag team cards, or a way to custom make tag teams.
6 man tag matches!
Tag Team Feuds! The American Heroes vs the Anti-Americans could be called Global War.
|
|
|
|
Post by Papa Chopper on Aug 23, 2017 13:39:43 GMT -5
OH one more suggestion:
Given the increasing difficulty in unlocking the merchandise for wrestler the higher they are on the card, couldn't the Merch Cards be revised to have increasing values based on the wrestler's position? Surely HFK's merch should command a higher value than Jobber Joe's?
And I'm not even saying extrapolate too much...100 for Legends, 50 for Main Event, 40 for Upper Midcard, 25 for Midcard, 15 for Opener, 10 for Jobber. or start at 50 for Jobber and work up to a value that isn't game-breaking for the legends.
|
|
|
|
Post by Papa Chopper on Aug 28, 2017 15:24:48 GMT -5
And here's another suggestion but I'm not sure if it could be a "game breaker" or not...
It'd be kinda cool to have some level of a "breakdown" of the earnings...perhaps per segment/match...but not overly detailed as to what each wrestler/flavor represents cos that might allow for too much extrapolation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Voidhawk on Aug 29, 2017 18:24:53 GMT -5
I have been thinking about the special matches like triple threat, fatal 4 way, 6 man tag, etc. It seems to me that the game as currently implemented cannot support them unless they are pre-scheduled. None of the match flavors affect the number of wrestlers involved.
Seems like a big update would need to be done where we in essence have X number of slots per show and pick our own lineup or we have a few open spots.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dark Invader on Aug 31, 2017 12:06:25 GMT -5
The "Now You Know!" section should show facts relevant to your current year, or maybe decade. This would help show tag teams and feuds for the 90's while in the 90's or 80's when in the 80's and so on.
|
|
|
|
Post by zanysteve on Sept 1, 2017 2:25:50 GMT -5
1.The "Local Wrestler" should have a name and drawing.
2.Each Fed should have its own Local Wrestler.
3.The 80s Sponsor card price award should change going into the 90s.Likewise a 90s Sponsor card shouldn't work /or be as rewarding if used in the 80s.
4.A T.V. Studio arena card for the 80s.
5.Five or Six Matches per card (always a tag match included).
|
|
|
|
Post by Dark Invader on Sept 2, 2017 2:26:04 GMT -5
There's no match type for Showman or Bigmouth wrestlers. Maybe we could change I Quit from Patriot to Bigmouth and No Holds Barred to Showman from Ghoulie since they have 3 types. Or we create new match types entirely.
|
|
|
|
Post by Magnifico jr. on Sept 3, 2017 1:44:16 GMT -5
There's no match type for Showman or Bigmouth wrestlers. Maybe we could change I Quit from Patriot to Bigmouth and No Holds Barred to Showman from Ghoulie since they have 3 types. Or we create new match types entirely. maybe and I know this is dumb but maybe a rap battle or the reason they don't have a match is because only they get mic spots |
|
|
|
Post by unrealggecko on Sept 3, 2017 5:54:33 GMT -5
New guy in here. Greetings from Lithuania!
Have a suggestion for the game. Noticed that many wrestlers end their gimmicks/careers in 1989 or 1990 in this game... so I was wondering that maybe their could be a slightly smoother transition between that? Something like ending Chet Skye in 1992 (HFK would start in 1993) and say Buzzsaw would only start in 1987 etc.
Not sure what others think about it?
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
Post by darthdadt on Sept 13, 2017 23:28:14 GMT -5
Two things I've been thinking about. The first is in the championship records. It currently lists the month as the month from Jan 1980. (So if the total was won the Jan of 81 the month listed is 13)I think it would be more useful to list the actual month. Then I don't have to hurt my head doing math.
The second is with token economy and push. IRL a booker could push whoever they wanted and after they have their run they bow out to the next big dog.
For games sake I think the tokens do a great job. But I see no reason to spend a token to demote a wrestler. (Even if I would like to ease them back and let someone else be the hot guy) I also think it would be nice to be able to push more guys more often.
What I would propose is three fold
A) make demotion free.
B) give out a token at the end of the year and at 6 months
C) make tokens worth half as much cash.
This way you can back a guy down after he has a good run. You get more tokens to play with but if a player only intends to use the token for cash his buying power remains the same. And actually removes the need to grind a whole year for a token.
|
|
|
|
Post by Papa Chopper on Sept 14, 2017 11:34:37 GMT -5
Two things I've been thinking about. The first is in the championship records. It currently lists the month as the month from Jan 1980. (So if the total was won the Jan of 81 the month listed is 13)I think it would be more useful to list the actual month. Then I don't have to hurt my head doing math. The second is with token economy and push. IRL a booker could push whoever they wanted and after they have their run they bow out to the next big dog. For games sake I think the tokens do a great job. But I see no reason to spend a token to demote a wrestler. (Even if I would like to ease them back and let someone else be the hot guy) I also think it would be nice to be able to push more guys more often. What I would propose is three fold A) make demotion free. B) give out a token at the end of the year and at 6 months C) make tokens worth half as much cash. This way you can back a guy down after he has a good run. You get more tokens to play with but if a player only intends to use the token for cash his buying power remains the same. And actually removes the need to grind a whole year for a token. I totally agree that there is very little point to spending a token on promoting/demoting a guy. But what if the "push" could be somewhat more dynamic? I'm thinking it could start at the BASE VALUE it already has but vary over time based on things like: - being booked or not (idle cards lose their push over time until it reaches base level again). - instead the champion getting the push bonus automatically, winning or defending the title increases push. - higher ratings during matches can help increase push over time (winner gets more than the loser). - Etc. Come up with some wacky formula and you end up with a more dynamic experience. |
|
|
|
Post by darthdadt on Oct 7, 2017 23:16:34 GMT -5
This idea just came to me.
Would anyone want the ability to have a champion vacate the title?
The reason the ide came to me is that I'd like my current TV champ, Chet Skye, to be able to wrestle Chicano for the World belt, as Chet defended his title against Chicano twice before Chicano went on to win the world belt.
|
|
